TL;DR
ScamSignals reviewed bergev.org after it was named in a U.S. SEC complaint describing an “investment confidence scam” tied to fake crypto trading platforms and messaging-based “investment clubs.” The SEC alleges $14 million in total investor losses across the connected operation. Independent online reports (including Reddit victim posts and Trustpilot feedback) describe blocked withdrawals and demands for extra payments to “unlock” funds. Our stance: Avoid / Confirmed scam-pattern risk (regulator-linked).
Introduction
When a platform claims your withdrawal is “frozen” until you pay a tax, verification fee, or unlock charge, it usually isn’t a compliance issue—it’s a trap. That’s why this bergev.org review focuses on the evidence that matters: regulator filings, consistent victim patterns, and how the scam typically unfolds.
ScamSignals is not a recovery firm. Our job is to help people avoid mistakes, spot secondary “recovery scams,” and find a credible path if funds already moved. In this case, the strongest anchor is an SEC enforcement filing naming Berge Blockchain Technology Co., Ltd. and the bergev.org site as part of an alleged coordinated fraud scheme.
If you’re affected, don’t panic-spend. Preserve proof, stop paying fees, and move methodically. We’ll end with a simple action checklist and safe alternatives.
Quick Verdict Box
| Item | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Rating | 2 / 10 |
| Pros | Easy to join; looks legitimate at first glance |
| Cons | Named in SEC complaint; withdrawal-fee trap; messaging-group recruitment; high spam around “recovery” |
| Summary | Avoid. Regulator-linked allegations + consistent reports of blocked withdrawals = extreme risk. |
Overview
Entity reviewed: Berge Blockchain Technology Co., Ltd.
Primary domain: bergev.org
Known aliases/domains: www.bergev.org (Berge references also appear in broader online discussions)
Claimed details (what’s known):
In the SEC complaint narrative, Berge is described as a Colorado corporation (in “delinquent” status) and as operating a purported crypto trading platform using www.bergev.org.
Key Features or Offerings
From the SEC narrative and victim reports, bergev.org is commonly presented as:
A crypto trading platform with a user dashboard and “signals” or guided trades
A group-driven program (often framed like an “investment club”) on messaging apps The Record from Recorded
A deposit-first flow with escalating “requirements” before withdrawals (fees/taxes/verification)
Payment methods (in sources): Most reports in this scam family involve crypto transfers. Specific rails (USDT vs BTC, exchange used, bank wire/card) vary by victim and are not consistently disclosed in public posts.
Red Flags or Positive Indicators
Red flags
SEC case linkage: bergev.org is named in a filed complaint describing a coordinated fraud scheme.
“Fee to withdraw” demands: A hallmark of confidence scams; described in the complaint and echoed in victim posts.
Messaging-group recruiting: Reported as part of the scam funnel.
High-value losses reported: Large-loss stories appear in victim discussions (credible signal; not a network-wide total). Reddit
Recovery-scam spam nearby: Some pages/posts pivot to “DM for recovery” or name-drop sketchy recovery sites—classic second-wave fraud. Medium
Positive indicators (weak / not decisive)
Some automated trust-rating sites can show mixed scores; these are not reliable due diligence, especially for new or manipulated domains.
Real User Reviews / Online Reputation
ScamSignals found the most useful signals came from multi-platform consistency:
Trustpilot: bergev.org shows a low TrustScore with few reviews—small sample, but directionally negative.
Reddit: A detailed post claims $250k+ lost after involvement with “Berge” and links to bergev.org directly.
Reddit (additional): Discussion naming bergev.org repeats the “withdrawal fee/tax” trap concept and warns not to pay.
Public group repost (Facebook): Mentions bergev.org and describes sending funds; supportive but not as verifiable as regulator docs.
What we ignored/downranked:
YouTube/Instagram posts that say “withdraw instantly—contact me” (lead-gen).
Medium posts that end in a “miracle recovery” referral (high risk of recovery scam).
ScamSignals Expert Opinion
The SEC press release alleges a scheme that misappropriated $14 million and used fake trading + social recruitment.
The SEC complaint names Berge and states Berge operated via www.bergev.org.
What’s highly consistent with scam mechanics:
“Fee to withdraw” demands and account-freeze threats, echoed in victim discussions.
What’s not proven from public posts alone:
The exact wallet cluster, the specific off-ramp used, and the Berge-only loss total.
Final Verdict
Avoid. This bergev.org review finds regulator-linked allegations and consistent withdrawal-fee mechanics. If you already paid, the next move is not another fee—it’s evidence preservation, reporting, and a trace if crypto was involved.
FAQs
-
Is bergev.org legit?
Given the SEC complaint naming Berge/bergev.org and consistent withdrawal-fee reports, ScamSignals recommends avoiding bergev.org.
-
Why does bergev.org ask for a fee to withdraw?
In many crypto confidence scams, “fees” are used to extract Trustpilot victim tries to exit. The SEC complaint describes this dynamic.
-
What if I already sent crypto to bergev.org?
Preserve your withdrawal confirmations, stop paying fees, and file reports. If you want a structured trace pathway, start here: https://www.melmac-solutions.com/get-started
-
Are bergev.org reliable?
They are a signal but not definitive. Use them alongside regulator documents and cross-platform victim patterns.
Related Posts
Morocoin Tech Corp. Review — What Investors Should Know
TL;DR Morocoin Tech Corp. faces complaints regarding blocked withdrawals and lack of regulatory clarity. Although no formal scam accusations exist, the company’s unresolved user complaints…
Read More
NGS Crypto Pty Ltd Review — What Investors Should Know
TL;DR NGS Crypto Pty Ltd has drawn attention due to user-reported withdrawal delays and lack of licensing transparency. While not officially blacklisted by regulators, available…
Read More